Union
of BC Municipalities Resolutions (Re Drinking Water Sources)
[Note: the following list of resolutions on the topic of drinking water may be incomplete.]
YEAR |
RESOLUTION NUMBER |
RESOLUTION NAME |
RESOLUTION
SPONSOR |
1971 |
48 |
Authority over Community Watersheds |
Summerland |
1973 |
52 |
Protection of Community Watersheds |
Comox-Strathcona RD |
1979 |
100 |
Crown Land Watersheds |
Cranbrook |
?? |
3.2 |
Municipal Watersheds Within Tree Farm Licences |
Town of Creston |
1982 |
A38 |
Control and Maintenance of Watersheds |
Nelson City |
1986 |
B31 |
Logging Guidelines |
Central-Kootenay RD |
1986 |
B36 |
Water Licensee Indemnification |
Central-Kootenay RD |
1987 |
B46 |
Compensation for Damages to Watershed Areas |
Nelson City |
1988 |
LR5 |
Compensation for Damages to Watershed Areas |
Nelson City |
1988 |
LR4 |
Protection of Groundwater |
Cowichan Valley |
1989 |
A12 |
Provincial Land Use Strategy |
Squamish |
1989 |
A18 |
Logging on Private Lands |
Various |
1989 |
B25 |
Groundwater Control |
Penticton |
1990 |
A17 |
Pesticide Spraying in Community Watersheds |
UBCM Executive |
1990 |
B42 |
Timber Supply Committee - Representation |
Nelson City |
1990 |
B43 |
Water Act |
Kamloops City |
1990 |
LR13 |
Logging on Private Lands |
Central Kootenay RD |
1990 |
LR17 |
Control of Quality/Quantity Drinkwater |
Central Kootenay RD |
1991 |
B14 |
Watershed Designation |
Rossland |
1991 |
B15 |
Groundwater Management |
Coldstream |
1991 |
B16 |
Logging on Privately Owned Land |
Kootenay-Boundary RD |
1993 |
C43 |
Watershed Designation (Referred to UBCM Executive) |
Saanich |
1993 |
C44 |
Groundwater Licensing (not ratified by UBCM) |
Abbotsford |
1994 |
B82 |
Private Land Logging |
Coldstream |
1994 |
B13 |
Notification of Mining Exploration |
Summerland |
1995 |
B46 |
Legislated Environmental Regulations |
Mount Waddington RD |
1997 |
B61 |
Private Land Logging (Referred to UBCM Executive) |
Coldstream |
1998 |
B65 |
Authority over Community Watersheds |
Sunshine Coast RD |
1998 |
B72 |
Ground Water Management |
Nanaimo RD |
1998 |
C33 |
Water Quality and Quantity (not ratified by UBCM) |
Kimberley |
1999 |
A17 |
Protecting Drinking Water Sources |
UBCM Executive |
1999 |
B63 |
Opposition of Sale of Public Land Forest Tenures |
Campbell River |
2000 |
B22 |
Groundwater Protection Legislation |
Maple Ridge |
2001 |
B28 |
Groundwater Regulations |
Langley Township |
2001 |
B80 |
Delay of Provincial Drinking Water Protection Plan |
Kootenay-Boundary RD |
2002 |
B52 |
Drinking Water Protection – Surcharges |
Central Kootenay RD |
2002 |
B54 |
Protection of Municipal Water Systems |
Fort Nelson/NRRD |
2003 |
B22 |
Groundwater Protection |
Nanaimo RD |
2003 |
B129 |
Coalbed Methane |
Comox Strathcona RD |
2004 |
B77 |
Establishment of Water Management Boards |
Midway |
2004 |
B84 |
Community Watershed Land Use Recreational Risk Assessments |
Kimberley |
2004 |
B85 |
Local Governments and Water Suppliers |
Okanagan Similkameen RD |
2004 |
B112 |
Reduction of Phosphates in Municipal Wastewater |
Lake Cowichan |
2004 |
SR2 |
Environment Policy Development |
UBCM Executive |
2004 |
Emergency Resolution (Off floor) |
Community Watersheds |
Sunshine Coast RD |
1971, Resolution #48 - tabled by the town of Summerland (in the Okanagan):
WHEREAS municipalities, water improvement districts, irrigation districts
and similar authorities are charged with the provision of consistent and safe
supply of water for human, agricultural and industrial use;
AND WHEREAS such provision requires
control of watershed systems to yield constant supply in both quantity and quality;
AND WHEREAS the increasing and varied
industrial, agricultural, commercial and recreational uses being conducted in
watersheds pose a threat to the prime purpose of watershed management;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that for
the purposes of ensuring that administration and management of resources within
watersheds are coordinated between government agencies consistent with
provision of water for human use, the Government of B.C. be urged to establish,
by legislation, an authority or board which shall have the single
responsibility of coordinating the administration of and management of land
uses and natural product utilization within each watershed.
1973, Resolution #52 - tabled by the Comox-Strathcona District
(Vancouver Island):
WHEREAS it is desirable that watersheds forming
water sources for community water supplies should be protected and regulated by
competent authority to ensure that quality and quantity of water supply be
continuously maintained; AND WHEREAS major areas of watersheds are often in
private ownership;
AND WHEREAS it has been ruled by the
Department of Health the “Sanitary Regulations Governing Watersheds” issued
pursuant to the Health Act are not applicable to privately held lands within
such watersheds;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Provincial
Government be requested to establish standards for all community watershed
areas; these standards to give the Health authorities a guideline which will
enable them to determine any deterioration in water quality whatever the
cause; and further that the Health authorities be authorized to enforce the
required remedial action.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Provincial
Government be asked to place a freeze on sales and/or leases of any Crown land
in any municipal watersheds to private individuals or companies;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED
that the Provincial Government aid in reclaiming privately owned land in
municipal watersheds in which domestic animals or other conditions could affect
the purity of the water.
Response from the Ministry of Lands, Parks and Housing:
“The Ministry is prepared to receive requests from municipalities to place a reserve over Crown lands to protect the watershed. This in effect freezes the sales and leases of Crown land in the affected area. If the area will be actively used as a watershed the reserve should be secured by an Order-in-Council to protect the long-term quality of the water supply.
A study of watersheds conducted by the Ministry of the Environment is generally used to guide Ministry decisions. This Ministry does not deal directly with the purchase of privately owned land in watersheds. Normally the local government would appraise such costs as part of those associated with developing a domestic water system. Cost of buying back private land has to be traded off against cost of a more expensive water treatment system to ensure the purity of water.”
Response from the Ministry of Environment:
“The Ministry is investigating placing a freeze on sales and/or leases of Crown land in 150 watersheds held under map reserves. These watersheds are all less than 6 square miles. A Task Force investigation indicated it would not be practical to place a freeze on larger watersheds.
Municipalities may find it advantageous to buy privately owned land for protection purposes in smaller watersheds, but the provincial government should not be expected to participate. Specific watershed problems should be referred to the Water Investigations Branch of the Ministry of Environment.”
The Deputy Minister of Municipal Affairs, R.W. Long, sent
the above resolution to Ben Marr, the Deputy Minister of the Environment, on
January 28, 1980:
“Enclosed please find the resolutions endorsed by the Union of British Columbia Municipalities at their 1979 convention. They have been sent to inform you of the position of the U.B.C.M. as it relates to your Ministry, and to obtain your response to the subject matter of the resolutions. In some cases the subject matter of resolutions is familiar, but we are nevertheless interested in your current position. Would you please respond to the resolutions by stating your position on the matter, commenting on the validity of the argument presented in the resolution, specifying any points with which you take issue, and suggesting, where applicable, an appropriate position for Mr. Vander Zalm to take in discussing the issue with U.B.C.M. representatives.”
On February 15, 1980, J.D. Watts, chairman of The Task
Force, and chief of the Planning and Surveys Division of the Water
Investigations Branch, sent a memo to the Director of the Water Investigations
Branch, P.M. Brady, to respond to Ben Marr’s request for a reply to resolution
#100:
“(1) The Ministry of Environment is actively
investigating the practicality of placing a freeze on sales and leases of crown
land in some 150 watersheds which are currently held under map reserves for
administrative purposes. These 150 watersheds are those which are less
than six square miles in area and substantially free from present public
uses. There are an additional 126 map reserves on watersheds ranging in
size from six square miles to 200 square miles
(2) and (3) As a result of investigations by a Task Force set up to consider
multiple use problems of watersheds used as community water supplies, it does
not appear practical to place a freeze on, or to overly restrict agricultural
and public activities in watersheds much in excess of six square miles in area
in which there are extensive existing public and/or resource activities.
It is noted that Joseph Creek, the watershed of the City of Cranbrook, the
municipality sponsoring this resolution, falls into this category as it is 32.7
square miles in area and contains much agricultural land. In a few of the
smaller watersheds, individual municipalities may find it advantageous to buy
critical areas of privately owned land within watersheds for protection
purposes. However, the Provincial Government should not be expected to
participate in this, as it is already making substantial contribution in
holding the majority of the land in these areas under map reserve for water
supply purposes.
(4) The Minister, Mr. Vander Zalm, should advise that specific watershed
management problems should be referred to the Water Investigations Branch of
the Ministry of Environment.”
No Date, Resolution 3.2 - tabled by the Town of Creston, MUNICIPAL WATERSHEDS WITHIN TREE FARM LICENCES:
WHEREAS the Ministry of Forests is planning to establish
Tree Farm Licences throughout British Columbia, which places control of the
various resource users with the holders of such licences;
AND WHEREAS many Municipalities and Improvement Districts
utilize the watersheds within these planned Tree Farm Licences to serve their
respective users with pure potable water, and under proposed regulation, would
have no control over the licensee in his operations within these watersheds
which could affect the quality and quantity of water used by holders of water
licences resulting in disastrous effects to the economy and well being of its
water users:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Government of
British Columbia be requested to place watersheds which serve Municipalities
and Improvement Districts, where no feasible alternative water supply is
readily available, in a separate category within Tree Farm Licences whereby
control of harvesting of wood products within those watersheds would be with
the Ministry of Environment and the prime water licence holders jointly, and
not with the Tree Farm Licencee.
WHEREAS the maintenance of the high quality and adequate
quantities of supplies of water is of prime concern to all purveyors of water
in the Province of British Columbia;
AND WHEREAS there is widespread pressure by the Ministry of
Forests and the logging industry to open watersheds on Crown lands to logging
operations and other developments;
AND WHEREAS in the past, some logging operations, associated
road building and other development have been carried out in such a manner as
to damage community water supplies;
AND WHEREAS at present, authority over watersheds on Crown
lands is vested in the Ministry of Forests:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT U.B.C.M. request the
Provincial Government to alter any purveyor of water the right and power to
participate with the Ministry of Forests, any other Ministries involved and any
involved industry in the planning and execution of any operations within the
watersheds of that purveyor and that decisions to proceed with such operations
must be made by consensus of the parties involved.”
1986, Resolutions B31, B36 - tabled by the Central
Kootenay Regional District (endorsed by the Association of Kootenay &
Boundary Municipalities):
B31. LOGGING GUIDELINES.
WHEREAS there is a growing concern
amongst residents that the Province of British Columbia does not have
regulations regarding commercial logging on private property;
AND WHEREAS the Province of British Columbia
does have regulations regarding commercial logging on Crown Land and the said
regulations encourage responsible logging practices to the extent of providing
protection of community water systems, protection from soil erosion and protection
from excessive fire hazards:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that
the Union of British Columbia Municipalities petition the Provincial Government
to develop suitable guidelines that could be referred to by commercial loggers
when logging on private property.
B36. WATER LICENSEE
INDEMNIFICATION.
WHEREAS the Provincial
Government is responsible for issuing licences for the extraction or use of
provincial resources which at time lead to conflicts between the uses licenced;
AND WHEREAS municipalities, regional districts, water improvement districts and
others holding a priority use licence for domestic water supply have found that
subsequently issued licences for uses such as logging have resulted in
financial hardship to the prior use licensee and have caused deterioration of
the prior use of resources:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that
the Provincial Government be requested to reimburse a prior use licensee where
the issuance of a subsequent licence results in financial or resource loss to
the priority user and the Provincial Government seek its own reimbursement of
costs from the licensee causing damage.
1987, Resolution B46 - tabled by Nelson City, COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES TO WATERSHED AREAS:
WHEREAS there is a growing concern throughout the Province
about resource extraction in watershed
areas, and the negative impact of such resource
extraction on the quality of potable water;
AND WHEREAS it is difficult, if not impossible, to prove fault in the case of
damage to watershed areas:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Provincial Government be urged to
provide no fault compensation for areas damaged by resource extraction.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Forests and Lands:
The Ministry of Forests and Lands is currently drafting policy to deal
with this issue. The thrust of this policy will comprise the
following major principles:
* financial liability will not be accepted by government,
* planning and harvesting must be conducted in a manner which ensures that
water quality and quantity are affected by harvesting as minimally as possible,
* water licensees have the right to seek litigation to address perceived
damage,
* water licensees have the right to make informal appeals to government for
financial assistance if damage occurs after all reasonable precautions
have been taken.
1988, Resolution LR5 - tabled by Nelson City, COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES TO WATERSHED AREAS:
WHEREAS there is a growing concern throughout the Province
of British Columbia regarding resource extraction in watershed areas because of
the possible negative impact of such resource extraction on the quality of
potable water and because of the difficulties, extreme costs and virtual
impossibility of litigation in the event of damages;
AND WHEREAS the preservation of watershed areas and the
potable water resources they contain is vital to the health of a community,
repairs must be instituted immediately in the event of damage:
THEREFORE BE
IT RESOLVED that: (a) The Provincial Government establish a no fault insurance
pool to pay for costs for immediate repairs to such assets and water supply
areas and water supplies damaged through resource extraction; (b) The funding
for such an insurance pool come from resource extraction companies through
posted bonds or similar funding and through royalties and stumpage fees paid to
the Province; (c) Liability for the damage to be apportioned through an
arbitration board decision and the fund reimbursed accordingly. Such
arbitration board to be established prior to resource extraction being
instituted. The composition of the arbitration board to include municipal
(regional) representation for the area affected, technical expert acting for
the municipality (region) affected, appropriate ministry representative, the
industry involved plus a fifth party to be chosen by the other four members as
an impartial voting member.”
WHEREAS groundwater resources are extremely important for
residential and agricultural uses;
AND WHEREAS there are increasing conflicts between water
users and other activities which tend to damage or deplete acquifers:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Province of British
Columbia enact legislation that would authorize the Minister of Environment to
regulate and protect groundwater resources.
Resolutions Committee:
The Resolutions Committee notes that a similar resolution was endorsed in 1982 (A49 - Licensing of Water Wells). The background information provided by the sponsor indicated that the matter was not identified until after the June 30th deadline date.
1989, Resolution A12 - tabled by the town of
Squamish, PROVINCIAL LAND USE STRATEGY:
WHEREAS conflicts have arisen over the usage of Crown and private lands in
well-travelled corridors in British Columbia;
AND WHEREAS the Provincial Government is cooperating in the development of
Local Resource Use Plans and land use strategy conferences such as the Dunsmuir
Agreement of November 1988:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the provincial government be asked to
develop a comprehensive land use strategy for the province of British Columbia
involving a review of Crown and private lands in order to protect energy,
forestry, tourism, water quality and community watersheds, and other sustainable
values, and that for lands within a local government’s boundaries, the local
government be involved in developing the land use strategy.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Municipal Affairs, Recreation and Culture.
This is one of the assignments of the Provincial Roundtable on the Environment
and the Economy. The Roundtable has members from local government.
1989, Resolution A18 - tabled by various municipalities, LOGGING ON
PRIVATE LANDS:
WHEREAS logging on Crown Land is closely regulated by the Provincial Ministry
of Forests with consideration being given to the potential impact on the
environment, in contrast to logging on private land which is largely
unregulated except for a few controls that may be applied after the fact with
respect to water resources;
AND WHEREAS even though Section 978 of the Municipal Act does provide some
limited authority to regulate logging on private lands, local governments do
not have the resources to properly administer such a process and are concerned
that continued logging on private lands without adequate regulation can result
in negative impacts on the environment, especially where community watersheds
are involved:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Provincial Government be requested to
assume direct responsibility for the regulation of logging on private lands and
maintain control of all community watersheds including those located in Tree
Farm Licences in order to offer better protection for the environment in
general and community watersheds in particular.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all activities in watersheds used for
drinking water, be they resource extraction or any other activity, be subject
to final approval and control by the major water licence holders and by the
Ministry of Environment, Water Management Branch; and that the Water Act
regulating these watersheds be amended to require the Ministry of Environment
to ensure proper maintenance of quantity as well as protection of the quality
of this water so that it will continue to meet Ministry of Health requirements
for drinking water quality.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Municipal Affairs, Recreation and Culture.
This matter has been reviewed at the Cabinet level and the Minister of Forests
is examining options.
1989, Resolution B25 - tabled by Penticton City, GROUNDWATER CONTROL:
WHEREAS many private homeowners, local governments, and
improvement districts obtain their domestic water supply from groundwater
aquifers;
AND WHEREAS there is no current monitoring or legislation
with respect to quantities taken from an aquifer or their protection from
adjacent surface activities:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British
Columbia Municipalities urge the Province of British Columbia to investigate
and enact legislation and regulations with respect to groundwater control and
protection of this valuable resource.
RESPONSE
FROM: Ministry of Environment
The Government of British Columbia recognizes the need for regulation and
protection of the groundwater resources of the Province and supports the UBCM resolution.
Groundwater legislation is currently being planned for introduction in 1991. Preparatory
steps including discussions with public and professional groups are to take place during 1990.
1990, Resolution A17 - tabled by the UBCM Executive, PESTICIDE
SPRAYING IN COMMUNITY WATERSHEDS:
WHEREAS the protection of community watersheds and the provision of a safe
water supply is the responsibility of the majority of local governments;
AND WHEREAS pesticides sprayed in community watersheds may enter the water
table and contaminate the water supply:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the local governments, including
improvement districts, whose watershed could be affected be notified of any
pesticide use proposed in community watersheds, and of the chemicals to be
used, and that the municipality or regional district be afforded the time and
opportunity to comment on the use of pesticides in the watershed prior to any
action being taken.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Environment
Regulations were recently amended to inform the public and, indirectly, local
governments of applications for pesticide permits which may encompass community
watersheds and to encourage site-specific information from the public which
could be useful for evaluating such permits.
The suggestion that local governments be informed directly will be the
responsibility of Ministry regional offices because pesticide permits are in
the process of being regionalized.
1990, Resolution B42 - tabled by Nelson City, TIMBER
SUPPLY COMMITTEE - REPRESENTATION:
WHEREAS the annual allowable cut as set by the Ministry of
Forests directly influences the pressure to harvest throughout timber supply
areas (TSAs) and determines the risk of damage to other resources such as
water, wildlife and visual quality;
AND WHEREAS there is currently no public representation
(other than the forest industry) on TSA planning committees and analysis
sub-committees who recommend levels of cut to the Chief Forester;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Ministry of Forests
be required to include representatives of appropriate government bodies on TSA
planning committees and analysis sub-committees to ensure the protection of
other resource values.
RESPONSE
FROM: Ministry of Forests
The Ministry of Forests is currently revising its planning methods for
Provincial Forest Lands. Future plans at the district or Timber Supply Area (TSA) level will emphasize
forest land management and will require a thorough analysis, evaluation and
objective setting for all resources including those resources cited in the resolution (water, wildlife
and visual quality). A
key component of our new approach will be to enhance interagency input. We
envisage the formation of interagency planning teams, including representation from Regional
Districts, for each TSA or district level planning exercise. We propose that agency
representatives on the team will undertake consultations with all resource user groups. Furthermore,
broader public
involvement including elected municipal representatives will be essential for
the success of this planning initiative.
1990, Resolution B43, tabled by Kamloops City, WATER
ACT:
WHEREAS legislative amendments to the Water Act dealing with
water management regulations are being determined through the white paper
process;
AND WHEREAS changes will, among other things, propose that
water management planning become a mandated function to assist in resolving
water use conflict:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that municipalities be given
the opportunity to identify a role for themselves in the planning process to
review and comment on the proposed changes.
Since building inspections are not universally required, it would be
inappropriate to tie septic tank approvals to this function. In areas of the province where building inspection
applies, there is often agreement between local and regional district building inspectors and the
local Public Health Inspector/Environmental Health Officer, at they will not issue a
building permit until
the homeowner has obtained a sewage disposal permit.
In regards to access to septic tanks for regular maintenance, the Sewage
Disposal Regulation requires that access must be provided to each compartment of a septic tank. In
addition, the Regulations require clean-out openings with covers or plugs over the inlet and
outlets of all septic tanks. In 1989 the Ministry of Health developed the booklet Proper Sewage
Disposal - Vital to your Healthy Environment, which contains a section on servicing a septic tank.
1990, Resolution LR13 - tabled by Regional
District of Kootenay Boundary, LOGGING ON PRIVATE LANDS:
AND WHEREAS except for a few controls that may be applied
after the fact with respect to water
resources, logging on private lands is largely unregulated;
AND WHEREAS even though section 978 of the Municipal Act
does provide some limited authority to regulate logging on private lands,
local governments do not have the resources to properly administer such a
process;
AND WHEREAS the Regional District of Kootenay
Boundary is concerned that continued logging on private lands without
adequate regulation can result in negative impacts on the environment,
especially where community watersheds are involved;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Provincial Government be requested to
assume direct responsibility for the regulation of logging on private lands in
order to offer better protection for the environment in general and community watersheds in particular.
1990, Resolution LR17 - tabled by Regional
District of Central Kootenay, CONTROL OF QUALITY/QUANTITY DRINKWATER:
WHEREAS the quality and quantity of water for human
consumption taken from watersheds have steadily deteriorated and that the
protection of drinkwater is of prime importance;
AND WHEREAS it is clear that current protection practices
are insufficient and that too many contamination incidents occur;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT all activities in watersheds
used for drinkwater, be they resource extraction or any other activity, be
subject to final approval and control by the Ministry of Environment, Water
Management Branch, and that the Water Act regulating these watersheds be
amended to require the Ministry of Environment to ensure proper maintenance of
quantity as well as protection of the quality of this water so that it will
continue to meet Ministry of Health requirements for drinkwater quality.
1991, Resolution B14 - tabled by the town of
Rossland, WATERSHED DESIGNATION:
WHEREAS many municipalities draw surface water for their municipal water
systems, such sources being vulnerable to degradation and pollution caused by a
variety of industrial and recreational activities;
AND WHEREAS watersheds are not recognized in legislation, leaving a
municipality without adequate tools to enact measures for the protection of watersheds:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of B.C. Municipalities develop a
definition for the term “watershed” and prepare submissions to the appropriate
ministries of the provincial government asking for the recognition of
“watershed” as a land use in the Forest Act, the Water Act and the Municipal
Act.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks
Water supply is one of a number of resource uses in a watershed and to date
government policy has been to consider all resource uses within a philosophy of
integrated resource management. It is agreed by all resource agencies that the
primary consideration in a community water supply watershed is the protection
of the water resource for drinking water.
The Guidelines for watershed management of Crown Lands used as community water
supplies, October 1980, lists about 300 designated community water supply
watersheds which are “recognized” by having Crown Lands “notations of interest”
placed on them. This only ensures that
resource use proposals are referred to Water Management Division for comment
and that multiple resource use should follow the Guidelines.
The Ministry is currently reviewing all major legislation under its
jurisdiction and will be introducing revised legislation, including a new Water
Act, over the course of the next two years. New provisions to support water
quality protection and watershed planning are some of the many issues being
considered as part of the review exercise.
An Interagency Community Watershed Management Committee (co-chaired by B.
Turner, BCE Integrated Management Branch) is currently preparing a proposal to
review the current Guidelines and address a number of issues related to
community water supply watersheds. The action requested could be considered in
the context of this Committee.
1991, Resolution B15 - tabled by the town of
Coldstream, GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT:
WHEREAS the Government of British Columbia is charged with
the protection and management of natural resources;
AND WHEREAS groundwater is one of our most precious natural
resources;
AND WHEREAS conflicts are increasing regarding the use and
abuse of this valuable resource;
AND WHEREAS there are no statutes regulating the protection
and management of the above resource;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the UBCM urge the
Ministry of Environment and/or Health to introduce legislation for the
protection and management of groundwater.
RESPONSE
FROM: Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks
The Ministry concurs with your recommendations for ground water legislation to
ensure orderly development and protection of this valuable resource. The Ministry is currently
examining the options for ground water legislation as part of a number of future water
management initiatives for the Province. Your continuing support
for any legislative initiatives that may be forthcoming in this area is
welcomed.
1991, Resolution B16 - tabled by the Kootenay-Boundary Regional
District, LOGGING ON PRIVATELY OWNED LANDS:
WHEREAS logging on privately owned land can have significant adverse impacts
with respect to such matters as natural hazards, tourism, water quality, fish
and wildlife habitat, soil conservation and public services;
AND WHEREAS the provincial government does not have comprehensive legislation
to address this issue other than Bill 72 which, at this time, has not been
brought into force through concurrent regulations;
AND WHEREAS even if Bill 72 becomes enforceable, it has only limited
application to Managed Forest Lands which constitute only a small part of the
privately owned forested land base in this province;
AND WHEREAS there is a need for comprehensive provincial legislation for
logging on private lands which can be uniformly applied and administered using
the resources available through the Ministry of Forests:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia
Municipalities request the provincial government to develop comprehensive
legislation to regulate logging on all privately owned forested land in British
Columbia in a fair and uniform manner, and with a view towards maintaining a
healthy, sustainable forest industry while, at the same time, protecting
communities from the adverse impacts which can result from improper logging
practices on such properties or alternatively assign this regulatory authority
directly to local government.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Forests
The government is concerned about the undesirable consequences of some logging
on private land, especially the irresponsible logging by some land speculators
and others that demonstrate little interest in maintaining the long term
productivity of the land, and in addressing community concerns about watersheds
and landscape values.
With the exception of private land included in a tree farm license or woodlot
license, the available mechanisms for government to influence logging on
private land are very limited.
Recognizing that the introduction of any new regulation of private land,
whether interim or permanent, will be highly contentious with some landowners,
the government is currently exploring several alternatives for addressing
concerns about logging on private land.
One possibility is a Forest Practices Code, which would apply to Crown land,
and perhaps also to some or all private forest lands. Development of a Forest
Practices Code has now been assigned to the Forest Resources Commission, as
announced on January 21, 1992.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Municipal Affairs, Recreation and Housing
Consideration is being given to local government authority for controlling tree
cutting in urban and suburban areas. This will address tree cutting as
differentiated from logging. See Ministry of Forests response for additional
comments.
WHEREAS many municipalities draw surface water for their
municipal water systems, such sources being vulnerable to pollution caused by
industrial, recreational and logging activities;
AND WHEREAS watersheds are not recognized in legislation,
leaving a municipality without adequate tools to enact measures for protection
of watersheds:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the UBCM prepare
submissions to appropriate ministries of the provincial government asking for
the recognition of a “watershed” as a land use in the Forest Act, Water Act,
and Municipal Act.
The Resolutions Committee notes that the UBCM in its 1992 Environmental Action Plan requested changes in government policy and legislation to provide local government with sufficient authority to protect the water source - watershed or groundwater - which has been developed for the provision of water to the community. The Committee understands that the provincial government is in the process of developing a discussion paper on water policy.
1994, Resolution B13 - tabled by the town of
Summerland, NOTIFICATION OF MINING EXPLORATION:
WHEREAS mineral tenure holders are not required to notify municipalities or
regional districts when drilling explorations take place within those
boundaries or respective municipal watersheds;
AND WHEREAS such activities could have a harmful effect on those municipality’s
or regional district’s watersheds:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the UBCM petition the provincial
government to enact legislation whereby all applications received from mineral
tenure holders proposing to undertake exploratory drilling in any municipality
or regional district watershed, be referred to that municipality or regional
district affected before any work commences.
1994, Resolution B82 - tabled by Coldstream,
PRIVATE LAND LOGGING:
WHEREAS the Municipal Act was amended in 1992 to provide
municipalities with the authority to protect trees from cutting, removal and
damage;
AND WHEREAS the authority for this legislation was not
intended to be used to regulate forestry practices or “private land logging”;
AND WHEREAS local government has areas with timber resources
which may be subject to private land logging and negative environmental
impacts;
AND WHEREAS the local government is desirous of ensuring
that logging impacts, either on Crown or private lands, do not have a
detrimental effect on its residents and property;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of BC
Municipalities encourage the provincial government to introduce legislation
which would provide municipalities and regional districts the authority to
require submission and approval of logging plans on private lands to standards
sufficient to ensure no detrimental impacts to the residents or environment and
generally in accordance with acceptable forestry management practices
recommended by the Ministries of Forest and Environment.
Government has introduced several initiatives in recent years to deal with the
private land logging issue.
In 1992, government amended the Municipal Act to allow municipal councils to
pass bylaws regulating the cutting of trees on private land. These amendments
were directed at urban tree cutting issues such as tree removal for subdivision
development and the protection of “significant trees”.
Forests Minister Andrew Petter introduced the Forest Practices Code of British
Columbia Act on May 16, 1994. The Forest Practices Code is a system of
legislation, regulations, standards and field guides that will be used to
regulate the use of Crown forest, range and recreation resources and certain
private managed forest land. The Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act
is enabling legislation for the code. A regulation for private managed forest
land will be developed in the next few months.
A companion piece of legislation, the Forest Land Reserve Act, was introduced
shortly after the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act. This act
applies initially only to private land classified by the BC Assessment
Authority as “managed forest land,” however, Crown land will be added in the
future. The act ensures that this land stays in forest production and that
community growth is well planned.
Other measures may be considered once these initiatives are fully implemented.
1995, Resolution B46 - tabled by Mount Waddington
Regional District, LEGISLATED ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS:
WHEREAS
the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks is in the process of developing a
wide array of regulations on a number of issue areas including waste, ground
water, solid and liquid waste, air quality, etc.;
AND WHEREAS many of these regulations will effect local government, the
Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks be requested to clearly set out the
implications of all new regulations for local government and their
constituents:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of B.C. Municipalities request
the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks to conduct public hearings in
co-operation with Regional Districts in all parts of the province before
proceeding with this legislation.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Environment, Lands, and Parks
The ministry does not support this resolution in that public hearings are not
always the most effective or efficient means to obtain local government input into the
development of environmental policy or programs.
However, the ministry is committed to working with local government on all
matters related to environmental protection. To this end, the ministry, along with the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs, joined UBCM in the Fall of 1993, by signing the “Protocol on Sharing
Environmental Responsibilities.”
Part of the agreement established a Protocol Steering Committee, made up of
representatives from the two ministries, UBCM staff and local government elected officials. The
committee provides an ongoing opportunity for free and open discussion of environmental
issues from a local government and from a provincial government perspective; an opportunity
to share
information; and a process to ensure that there are “no surprises” with respect
to new legislation and major regulations. The overall intent of the committee is to build a better
understanding and working relationship between the two levels of government.
1997, Resolution B61 - tabled by Coldstream, PRIVATE LAND LOGGING
(referred to UBCM Executive):
WHEREAS
the Municipal Act was amended in 1992 to provide municipalities with the
authority to protect trees from cutting, removal and damage, and the authority
for this legislation was not intended to be used to regulate forestry practices
or “private land logging”;
AND WHEREAS local government has areas with timber resources which may be
subject to private logging and negative environmental impacts, and the local
government is desirous of ensuring that logging impacts, either on Crown or
private lands, do not have a detrimental effect on its residents and property:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of BC Municipalities encourage
the provincial government to introduce legislation which would ensure private
land owners meet the Forest Practices Code thereby ensuring no detrimental
impacts to the residents or environment and generally in accordance with
acceptable forestry management practices recommended by the Ministries of
Forests and Environment, Lands and Parks.
1998, Resolution B65 - tabled by the Sunshine Coast Regional District, AUTHORITY
OVER COMMUNITY WATERSHEDS:
WHEREAS municipalities, regional districts, water improvement districts, and
similar authorities are charged with providing a consistent supply of safe
water for human consumption and other uses with no legislated authority to
control activities which can adversely affect raw water sources in community
water sheds used for public drinking water;
AND WHEREAS neither the Ministry of Forests nor any other provincial ministry
acknowledges any legal responsibility for ensuring that activities authorized
by them in community watersheds do not adversely affect the quality, quantity
and timing of flows of raw water supplies used for public drinking water, which
has led to a long history of conflict in British Columbia between legally
constituted municipal water purveyors and provincial ministries over damage to
raw water quality and quantity from resource use activities in community
watersheds:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that for the purposes of ensuring that the
planning and management of resources within community watersheds are consistent
with the provision of water for human consumption, that all activities in
community watersheds be subject to the joint approval and control of the
municipal level governments, First Nations and water license holders, all of
whom are dependent on said community watersheds, and the Ministry of
Environment, Lands and Parks - Water Management Branch:
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the respective Provincial Acts
regulating community watershed authorities and activities be amended
accordingly.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks
Resolution B65 states that MoF and other provincial agencies do not acknowledge
any legal responsibility for ensuring activities authorized by them do not
adversely affect the quality, quantity, and timing of flows of raw water
supplies used for public drinking water supplies in BC. This has led to a long
history of conflict in BC between legally constituted municipal water purveyors
and provincial ministries over damage to raw water quality and quantity from
resource use activities in community watersheds.
Community Watersheds on Crown land are managed by the Province on a multi-use
basis with the primary goal being the protection of drinking water supplies.
The Province consults with water licensees, including local government, through
a number of land and resource use planning processes applicable to community
watersheds to ensure water supplies are protected. The community watershed
portion of Forest Development Plans are required by the Forest Practices Code
to be jointly approved by the Ministry of Forests and the Ministry of
Environment, Lands and Parks.
Discretion is exercised in how stakeholders are involved in planning processes,
including local government, based on technical issues present. This discretion
may be interpreted as creating inconsistencies.
The Forest Practices Code specifies that in Community Watersheds where Water
Quality Objectives have been established, those objectives must be met to
protect drinking water supplies. In addition, under the Forest Practices Code,
detailed Watershed Assessment Procedures are required in all Community
Watersheds. Local government may be consulted during the Watershed Assessment.
Ministry initiatives, such as the non-point source strategy for storm water and
agriculture drainage, water conservation strategy, the Fish Protection Act,
water quality and quantity monitoring, water resource education programs, and
encouraging improvements to water distribution systems are designed to assist
local government with managing community water supplies.
1998, Resolution B72 - tabled by Nanaimo Regional
District - GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT:
WHEREAS
water management is imperative to the long term safety and well being of all
communities, and groundwater is an essential component of many water supply
strategies and systems;
AND WHEREAS there are currently no regulations in place in British Columbia to
protect or manage either the quality or quantity of groundwater:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia
Municipalities petition the Provincial Government to immediately initiate a
process to finalize groundwater regulations in areas where problems have been
identified and there is a need to protect the water source.
RESPONSE FROM: MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, LANDS AND PARKS
British Columbia has no groundwater management legislation regulating
activities such as well drilling and groundwater use. Localized water-use
conflicts exist among groundwater users.
Public consultation carried out in 1994-95 following the 1993 discussion paper,
Stewardship of the Water of British Columbia, indicated that the majority of
stakeholders, including UBCM, supported legislation to protect and manage
groundwater in critical areas and provide standards for well drilling.
Since 1993 a number of measures have been introduced which protect groundwater:
* a regulation in 1995 under the Environmental Assessment Act requiring an
environmental impact review of groundwater diversion projects in excess of
75L/s;
* in 1995, the Water Protection Act which affirms the province’s ownership and
restricts the bulk removal of groundwater from the province;
* in 1997, the Fish Protection Act which enables the designation of water
management areas and development of plans where there are risks to water
quality including groundwater.
The Ministry is progressively developing an integrated approach to groundwater
management including measures, such as: enhanced inventory of wells, aquifer
classification and guidelines for community well head protection.
The Ministry is also encouraging communities dependent upon groundwater to
consider and incorporate measures to protect groundwater within their community
planning activities. A pilot project with the Islands Trust to develop a
voluntary groundwater protection plan on Hornby Island has been initiated.
In response to the Auditor General’s report “Protecting Drinking-Water
Sources”, which was released in April 1999, the government has asked the
provincial health officer to assess the quality of BC’s drinking water. Many of
the Auditor’s recommendations will be addressed through a drinking water
strategy and other initiatives being implemented by the ministries of
Environment and Health with involvement of other key ministries.
1998, Resolution C33 - tabled by the City of Kimberley, WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY (not ratified by the UBCM):
WHEREAS pure water is an important natural resource;NO MINISTRY SUBMISSION
1999, Resolution A17 - tabled by the UBCM Executive, PROTECTING
DRINKING WATER SOURCES:
WHEREAS the provincial Auditor-General in 1999 released a report entitled
“Protecting Drinking-Water Sources” which concluded that the province is not
adequately protecting drinking-water sources;
AND WHEREAS local government could be faced with $700 million in capital costs
for water filtration systems and approximately $30 million a year in
maintenance costs if community drinking water sources are not protected;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the UBCM request that the provincial
government take legislative action to ensure that drinking-water users and
suppliers have tenure rights, financial and liability protection;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the province, in consultation with local
government, establish a lead agency to ensure that drinking-water sources are
protected when policy decisions are made.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks
The Auditor General’s report makes 26 recommendations to improve source water
protection. Two of the recommendations reiterated by this resolution
state that the province:
1. Designate within government a lead agency for drinking-water interests,
to coordinate government policy and action on drinking-water issues; and
2. Carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the rights of access of
drinking water suppliers, to determine if they are appropriate.
The resolution expands the second Audit recommendation by proposing legislation
to include specific reference to water tenure rights, financial and liability
protection.
The government response to the Auditor’s report stated that the office of the
Provincial Health Officer and the regional health authorities serve the role of
lead agency for drinking-water interests, and that the province will explore
how to assist local health authorities to more effectively participate in land
use planning processes.
With regard to the need to improve coordination of government action:
1. A Directors’ level committee has been established which includes
representation of all 9 ministries and agencies which have an
interest in issues affecting drinking water, in order to coordinate government
actions to address the Auditor’s recommendations; and
2. MELP and the Ministry of Health are implementing a coordinated Drinking
Water Strategy, to improve drinking water protection.
In BC, as in most of North America, drinking water protection is achieved
through land use planning and management processes, and pollution prevention
measures such as afforded by BC’s Forest Practices Code, Waste Management Act
and Health Act, rather than through tenure rights.
Local governments in BC also have powers within existing legislative and policy
frameworks to protect drinking water supplies. These include:
1. The recently amended Municipal Act (Bill 26) gives local government
powers to prohibit pollution and impose penalties;
2. Under the Waste Management Act, local governments may implement Liquid
Waste Management Plans to address a wide range of land use activities;
3. Local governments may apply their broad land use planning and zoning
powers on private land to protect sensitive watersheds; and
4. Local governments may acquire or expropriate land to secure greater
water tenure.
An inter-ministry team has been established to review existing statutory rights
and common law rights of drinking water suppliers with regard to quality and
quantity of water and source water protection. UBCM will be consulted.
1999, Resolution B63 - tabled by the town of Campbell
River, OPPOSITION OF SALE OF PUBLIC LAND FOREST TENURES:
WHEREAS the management of public forest lands involves, in addition to timber
harvesting, the regulation of watersheds, fisheries, wildlife, outdoor
recreation, tourism, botanical forest products and other commercial and public
endeavours;
AND WHEREAS the future economic well being of the Province of British Columbia
relies on the use of public forest lands:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that UBCM express to the provincial government
its opposition to the sale or trade of Crown land without adequate local
government and public involvement.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Forests
The Ministry of Forests assumes that the UBCM’s concern arose because of the
possibility in early 1999 that public land might be given to MacMillan Bloedel
Limited (MB) as a way of compensating it for harvesting rights it lost to new
parks. As is generally known, the Province undertook widespread
consultation to determine whether the public favoured that approach, or would
rather pay compensation with cash. Many people strongly opposed the use
of land in this way, and so the Province announced in August, 1999 that it
would pay with cash only.
Other park-related compensation claims remain to be settled, but they are of a
much smaller scale than was the case with MB. Also, in the coming years
the Ministry anticipates numerous treaty settlements with First Nations
throughout the province, many of which will probably necessitate cancellation
of existing harvesting rights.
The Province is committed to paying fair compensation for losses attributable
to parks and to treaties. From time to time, it may prove more beneficial
to the public to pay with a small area of land rather than with cash. If
that appears to be the case, the Province will not make any decision without
first taking into account the views expressed by the public and by local
governments.
2000, Resolution B22 - tabled by the City of Maple Ridge, GROUNDWATER
PROTECTION LEGISLATION:
WHEREAS local government in British Columbia may establish and operate and
deregulate any service that is considered necessary or desirable including the
provisions of including safe and potable drinking water;
AND WHEREAS British Columbia has the highest incidence of waterborne disease in
Canada;
AND WHEREAS these water sources are often subsurface and subject to
contamination by a variety of aboveground land uses;
AND WHEREAS the Provinces of British Columbia and Quebec are the only
jurisdictions in North America without groundwater protection legislation;
AND WHEREAS a British Columbia government-commissioned health study in 1996
advocated the protection of groundwater resources in the Province by
legislation:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Province of British Columbia be
requested to draft groundwater protection legislation in an expeditious manner
in consultation with local government.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks
The Ministry supports this resolution and has worked with the Ministry of
Health and other Ministries to prepare the Drinking Water Protection Act which
includes provisions for the management and protection for groundwater in the
province.
The Act, which received Royal Assent on April 11, 2001, includes provisions
for:
* setting standards for well construction, maintenance and closures of wells;
* qualification requirements for water well drillers and well pump
installers;
* regulation of groundwater use in designated water management areas and
designated drinking water protection areas where there has been public
consultation; and
* setting requirements for community water systems to assess their groundwater
sources, floodproof their wells and develop well protection plans to protect
water quality.
Specific regulations for this Act need to be developed.
In addition to the Drinking Water Protection Act, existing legislation (e.g.,
the Waste Management Act and the Health Act) provides some further protection
measures for groundwater through the regulation of waste discharges from point
sources of pollution and permitting of domestic sewage systems, respectively.
Prior to the Act, a number of incremental measures were introduced to protect
groundwater:
* a regulation in 1994 under the Environmental Assessment Act, requiring an
environmental review of groundwater diversion projects in excess of 75 litres
per second;
* in 1995, the Water Protection Act, affirming the province’s ownership of
groundwater and restricting bulk removal of groundwater; and
* in 1997, the Fish Protection Act, enabling the designation of water
management areas and development of plans where there are risks to water
quality including groundwater. This provision is not yet in force.
The ministry believes that non-regulatory protection measures continue to be
necessary and is continuing the implementation of measures such as enhanced
inventory of wells and aquifers, groundwater protection workshops for
communities, and training sessions on the use of the Well Protection Toolkit
for community well users and water purveyors.
The ministry is also prepared to work with communities dependent upon
groundwater to develop local measures to protect groundwater within their
community planning activities. A pilot project is being conducted with
the Islands Trust and local Trust Committee to develop a voluntary groundwater
protection program on Hornby Island, and technical advisory assistance is being
provided to the community-based Grand Forks Aquifer Protection Society.
The ministry is also looking forward to working with UBCM, industry, other
ministry agencies and major stakeholders in developing meaningful, practical
groundwater regulations in support of the recently passed Drinking Water
Protection Act.
2001, Resolution B28 - tabled by Langley Township, GROUNDWATER
REGULATIONS:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Provincial Government immediately
enact groundwater regulations.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection
A priority is being placed on working with the Ministry of Health Planning to
pass real comprehensive groundwater legislation to improve the quality of
drinking water for British Columbians.
The recommendations on groundwater prepared by the external Drinking Water
Review Panel, which reviewed the Drinking Water Protection Act, are currently
being examined.
The Ministry is also continuing the implementation of non-regulatory measures,
such as monitoring of groundwater, inventory of aquifers, and aquifer
protection workshops for communities using groundwater.
2001, Resolution B80 - tabled by the Kootenay-Boundary Regional
District, DELAY OF PROVINCIAL DRINKING WATER PROTECTION PLAN:
WHEREAS the proposed Provincial Drinking Water Protection Plan may have broad
ranging implications with respect to land use, recreation and resource
utilization within source areas;
AND WHEREAS this initiative may also raise significant issues of concern to
local governments such as downloading of responsibilities, funding and
jurisdictional overlap:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Provincial Government embark on a
consultation program on the development of regulations and policies related to
the Provincial Drinking Water Protection Plan.
2002, Resolution B52 - tabled by the Central Kootenay Regional District,
DRINKING WATER PROTECTION – SURCHARGES:
WHEREAS the Minister of Water, Land and Air Protection and the Minister of
Health Services appointed a Drinking Water Review Panel to prepare a report and
make recommendations with regard to amendments to the Drinking Water Protection
Act and said Panel submitted its “Final Report: British Columbia Drinking Water
Protection Act, February 13, 2002” to the Ministers;
AND WHEREAS Recommendation #23 which reads as follows:
Enable Creation and Collection of a Drinking Water Protection Surcharge
consistent with the principle of full cost accounting and cost recovery enabled
through legislation, the ability to create a drinking water protection
surcharge that is dedicated exclusively for use in drinking water protection
(including funding to support Drinking Water Officers and the
Multi-Disciplinary Implementation Teams in each health region). The
surcharge will fund all new costs (above current resources dedicated in various
Ministries to drinking water) attributable to implementation of the Drinking
Water Protection Act. Surcharges, in varying and appropriate amounts,
could be added to fees charged to those who make use of water or are engaged in
activities that may adversely affect drinking water, such as the following:
• Stumpage fees for logging Crown land in drinking water supply
areas;
• Grazing leases and licences for cattle grazing in drinking water
supply areas;
• Mining licences or fees;
• Camping, golf green fees, parking or other outdoor recreation fees;
• Subdivision development charges;
• Septic system approvals;
• Water licence fees for surface water. This will translate
into licensed water rates for those receiving drinking water from a licensed
water supply system;
• Water licence and registration fees for groundwater users;
• Water licence fees for bottled water operations; and
• All tickets, fines and penalties associated with enforcement under
the Act,
creates a drinking water protection surcharge that is the establishment of yet
another new tax on British Columbia:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of BC Municipalities urge the
Minister of Water, Land and Air Protection and the Minister of Health Services
to exclude Recommendation 23 of the Drinking Water Review Panel’s “Final Report:
British Columbia Drinking Water Protection Act, February 13, 2002” from any
amendments to the Drinking Water Protection Act.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Health Services
This government has made a commitment to work with all levels of government,
and all British Columbians, in order to ensure the delivery of safe drinking
water in British Columbia.
The Drinking Water Action Plan will improve on a system that is regarded as one
of the safest in the country. Since November 2001, the government has
announced $109 million on water and sewer projects. In addition the
Ministry of Health Planning is investing almost $1.9 million this year to
monitor and safeguard B.C.’s water supply. The Ministry of Water, Land
and Air Protection will invest about $1.5 million in water monitoring activity
this year.
Government will immediately begin working on cost-recovery options to pay for
the short-term costs of the action plan including the new drinking water
officer positions. We will be working with key stakeholders to seek their
input and feedback on the options available. In the rare instance where a
drinking water protection plan will be required, a socio-economic analysis
would be performed to assess and advise on the full impact of the plan on the
affected communities. Water suppliers may face costs related to treatment
and distribution systems. Traditionally, financial assistance for
infrastructure improvements has been offered on a partnership basis with local
government suppliers and we will strive to maintain this approach.
Water suppliers, rather than the Province, typically set the water rates for
customers. Any changes in rates would be at their discretion.
2002, Resolution B54 - tabled by the town of Fort Nelson, Northern
Rockies Regional District, PROTECTION OF MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEMS:
WHEREAS the protection of safe, potable water supply is of primary importance
to all levels of government, especially for those levels of government directly
supplying potable drinking water;
AND WHEREAS water distribution should be protected by established principles of
law to ensure the quality and control of the water in water systems, so as to
minimize harmful exposure to contaminants and in order to assure compliance
with adopted guidelines for Canadian drinking water quality;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Council for the Town of Fort Nelson and
the Board for the Northern Rockies Regional District based on legal research,
there is not sufficient protection in law for municipalities or the public
against tampering with municipal water systems:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the provincial government adopt
legislation similar to section 23 and sections 40 to 45 of the proposed
“Drinking Water Protection Act 2001” which prohibits any tampering with water
systems and proposing penalties of considerable strength, recognizing that
encroachment of tampering with water systems places quality and control of
these systems in perilous jeopardy and negatively affects the ability of water
utilities to deliver a safe water supply, and establishing that such tampering
or encroachment is a criminal offense punishable by significant fines or a jail
term and providing authority for local government to stop such tampering or
encroachment, or the threat of such tampering or encroachment, under any
circumstance and with immediate effect.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Health Services
The Drinking Water Protection Act (DWPA) ensures a comprehensive framework for
drinking water safety from the source to the tap. At the same time, the Plan
recognizes the rights and legitimate activities of those living and working in
source water areas. Individuals, businesses and governments are all
responsible for ensuring source protection and must work together to achieve
the high standards necessary when drinking water is involved.
Those who tamper with a water system face penalties under the Health Act or the
Offence Act. Depending on the offence, individuals may face fines ranging from
$200 to $200,000, as well as possible criminal charges and imprisonment for up
to 12 months.
2003, Resolution B22 - tabled by the Nanaimo Regional District, GROUNDWATER
PROTECTION:
WHEREAS the provincial government has developed an Action Plan for Safe
Drinking Water in British Columbia that commits to the development of
groundwater protection legislation;
AND WHEREAS groundwater protection legislation and regulation is a priority for
all areas of British Columbia, and is of multi-jurisdictional interest and does
not conform to political or local government boundaries:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Union of BC Municipalities express to the
Province its support for new groundwater protection legislation;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the provincial government must provide
the resources and initiatives to implement its legislative responsibility and
authority for the province’s groundwater resource.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection
Protection of BC’s water resources is a priority and government will enact
groundwater protection regulations this year. The ministry will ensure
regulation provisions are comprehensive and workable, with strong measures to
protect groundwater. An expert advisory board is currently providing
technical advice in this work and will be instrumental in helping government
develop the new regulatory framework.
The ministry will continue to work with the other levels of government in order
to ensure the delivery of safe drinking water in British Columbia.
2003, Resolution B129 - tabled by the
Comox-Strathcona Regional District, COALBED METHANE:
WHEREAS the Province of British Columbia is promoting the exploration and
development of coalbed methane and has implemented a number of legislative and
monetary incentives and has sold more than $50 million in drilling rights for
coalbed methane projects;
AND WHEREAS coalbed methane development has high risks, especially regarding
impacts on groundwater and the quality of disposed water from its processes;
AND WHEREAS local communities, including their local governments, First Nations
and potentially affected landowners have not been adequately informed or
consulted about the effects of coalbed methane production;
AND WHEREAS the provincial government has not completed baseline studies in the
watersheds nor has it put in place adequate policies, procedures, regulations
and enforcement tools to protect communities from potential harm:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of BC Municipalities request
that the provincial government issue no further drilling licences, tenures, or
other permits for coalbed methane exploration and development until local
communities, their local government and First Nations are consulted and their
concerns are fully considered and until adequate policies, regulations and
guidelines are enacted to ensure the safe development of coalbed methane in the
Province of British Columbia.
RESPONSE FROM: Ministry of Energy and Mines
The government has strong and adequate policies, regulations and guidelines for
the safe and responsible development of coalbed gas. British Columbia has
over 50 years of experience in regulating and managing natural gas, with a
strong record of safety, environmental stewardship and community involvement.
Coalbed gas has some new aspects and issues, and government has made some
adaptations to current practices, but will safely and responsibly manage
development under the existing regulatory and policy framework.
The Ministry of Energy and Mines recognizes that communities have concerns
about potential coalbed gas development. It has made active efforts over
the past three years to communicate with communities to help them understand
the technology of coalbed gas development and the government processes involved
in leasing gas rights and developing the coalbed gas resource. In 2002,
the Ministry held 12 community meetings, and in 2003 it held 18 community
meetings in communities potentially affected by development. The Ministry
has also produced numerous community updates, fact sheets and brochures, as
well as web site information.
It is not necessary to halt drilling licenses, tenures or other permits for
coalbed methane exploration and development, but it is important for government
and communities to continue to work together to understand and manage coalbed
gas development.
2004, Resolution B77 - tabled by the town of Midway, ESTABLISHMENT
OF WATER MANAGEMENT BOARDS:
WHEREAS the provincial government indicates that there will
be increased development of green power projects utilizing water sources and
these projects will impact on existing and future water rights throughout the
affected river systems throughout the province;
AND WHEREAS the projected drought due to climate change will further impact
water resources:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of BC Municipalities request
that the Province of British Columbia actively, and as soon as possible,
establish and finance Water Management Review Boards, in consultation with
impacted local governments throughout the province.
2004, Resolution B84 - tabled by the town of Kimberley, COMMUNITY
WATERSHED LAND USE RECREATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENTS:
WHEREAS the Drinking Water Protection Act may now require a water supplier to
undertake water assessments that identify, inventory and assess the drinking
water source for the water supply system, including land use and other
activities and conditions that may affect that source;
AND WHEREAS the water supplier does not have authority to control land use,
including recreation activities that may affect the water source when the water
source is located on Crown lands:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the provincial government be required to
conduct adequate risk assessments that identify, inventory and assess threats
to drinking water, including recreation activities, prior to approving such use
on Crown lands within community watersheds.
2004, Resolution B85 - tabled by the
Okanagan-Similkameen Regional District, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND WATER
SUPPLIERS:
WHEREAS the Okanagan Valley has the fewest water resources per capita of any region
in Canada;
AND WHEREAS local governments and water suppliers require the ability to
optimize available water resources;
AND WHEREAS Land and Water BC Inc. (LWBC) is proposing to transfer to fee
simple numerous existing leased location lots surrounding drinking water
reservoir lakes which serve Okanagan Valley customers;
AND WHEREAS the vast majority of these lots are substantially smaller than the
1 ha minimum provincial funding standard for new lot subdivisions not served by
community sewer:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of BC Municipalities request that the
Minister of Sustainable Resource Management instruct LWBC to immediately
abandon the proposal to sell the leased recreation lots on all drinking water
reservoir lakes serving the Okanagan Basin Watershed.
2004, Resolution B112 - Tabled by the town of Lake
Cowichan, REDUCTION OF PHOSPHATES IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER:
WHEREAS the discharge of phosphate nutrients causes the eutrophication of
valuable fish bearing streams and pollutes drinking water;
AND WHEREAS local governments face considerable costs in having to comply with
required phosphorous concentration guidelines:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia
Municipalities urge the provincial government to implement measures to
discourage the use of phosphate detergents and encourage phosphorous-free
alternatives, through such measures as environmental taxes or rebates.
2004, Resolution SR2 - tabled by the UBCM Executive, ENVIRONMENT POLICY
DEVELOPMENT:
WHEREAS it is recognized that collaboration between the provincial government
and local government is necessary to manage the complex and challenging issues
of environment management,
AND WHEREAS that collaboration is supported by the Protocol on Principles for Sharing
Environmental Responsibilities between the UBCM and the provincial government
which fosters on-going communications and cooperation and also sets out a
principle of liability protection that states “Any devolution of authority or
responsibility should provide local government with protection from any
liability arising from the delivery of Provincial programs or standards when
acting in good faith and without negligence”;
AND WHEREAS the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection has established a
new approach to environment policy which focuses on:
- Shared Stewardship and Risk Based Approach,
- Partnerships and Compliance,
- Liability and Use of Qualified Professionals;
and is informing the development of several new policies, legislation and regulations;
AND WHEREAS the new approach to environment policy has not fully addressed
several of local governments specific interests or concerns around protection
of local government liability respecting the use of qualified professionals in
delivery of regulatory programs:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the provincial government provide local
government with clear protection from liability when following due process in
the delivery of a provincial regulation or policy, including but not limited to
the areas of:
- checking or not checking the qualifications of a declared
qualified environmental professional,
- carrying out regulatory authority, including approving permits
that rely on the report of a qualified professional,
- accepting site profile reports,
- development delays due to disputes or amendments to a qualified
professional report,
- accepting amendments to the SPEA recommendations by a qualified
professional based on requirements of other environment legislation or site
development constraints,
- performing or not performing monitoring or evaluation of the
implementation of qualified professional prescriptions,
- subsequent damages to fish habitat, developer interests, subject
site or neighbouring sites due to development that has been approved or
proceeded based on faulty or incomplete qualified professional reports;
- that for the purposes of accountability, it be clearly outlined
where local government bears responsibility for decisions and outcomes in the
site development approvals process when using qualified professionals.
2004, Emergency Resolution (based on 1998, Resolution
B65) - tabled by the Sunshine Coast Regional District, COMMUNITY WATERSHEDS:
WHEREAS the provincial government has not acted to grant management authority
to legally constituted water purveyors over community watersheds used for
potable water as recommended by UBCM resolution 1998-B65;
AND WHEREAS there are continuing conflicts of use within community watesheds
used for potable water all over British Columbia, as exemplified by the pending
sand and gravel extraction application in Chapman Creek Community Watershed that
serves approximately 21,000 Sunshine Coast residents;
AND WHEREAS the local purveyor of water and therefore the local ratepayer bear
all the long term financial liability for water treatment and for maintaining
water supply:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia
Municipalities urge the British Columbia provincial government to enact
legislation that empowers local government water purveyors to protect the
community watersheds used for potable water.